#Photmix vs easyhdr full version#
#Photmix vs easyhdr software#

For example, you can save projects here, and change the preview panel viewing options. This essentially contains everything else. Moreover, you can create your own presets and load samples from other sources.Īt the top of the program, there is the main toolbar. It simply contains thumbnails of the different preset edits available. Again, this is logically located and easy to follow. To the left of the preview panel is the presets panel. We like how this is a separate panel as it makes the process easy to follow.

#Photmix vs easyhdr software#

This is essentially the main part of the software – it is where you create new projects, and tailor the HDR merging process. On the right, the main HDR processing panel is located. This is where your images are displayed as a live preview. The preview panel is in the center of the program. This simple approach as you will see below means this program is easy to use. The basic layout of this software is extremely simple.

Formats – JPEG, JPEG2000, PNG, OpenEXR, RGBE, FITS, RAW.

If you do not have a state-of-the-art computer, EasyHDR could be a great solution. Moreover, an advanced GPU is not required either. 4GB of RAM and 2GB of storage should be standard on any modern computer within the last 5 years. The minimum system requirements are not demanding at all. Listed below are the basic system requirements of this software: System Requirements This software is also translated into 17 other languages including Spanish, German, Russian, French, and Polish.

#Photmix vs easyhdr full version#

For a one-off purchase the full version removes watermarks and allows unlimited usage. However, exported HDR images have a watermark. System Requirements & Basic FeaturesĮasyHDR is available as a demo version and a paid version. Commissions do not affect our evaluations. The most popularly and mentioned is not necessarily the best.When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission at no cost to you. The upper third of the lamp shade quite abruptly changes from yellow to white. There are random black dots produced by DPHDR. Look carefully at the upper right corner of the lamp shade. However, I found a nasty bug in the software that manifests as artifacts in the photo. Nice and smooth gradient.ĭynamic Photo HDR: Runner up. The results are as follows, from best to worst.ĮasyHDR: Best of the three. When correctly exposed the lamp would look almost washed out, when under exposed the lamp would show a gradience of shades - just as it would when seen by the human eyes. Well, I took three pictures of a desk lamp, under normal room light. I wanted to see, most importantly, that the blending and transition is smooth. I wanted to see them blending three images, one 2 stops under exposed, one correctly exposed, and one 2 stops over exposed, and have details of all three images appearing in the final image. All other considerations secondary, as I have many different imaging editing software that can do anything under the sun. I wanted to see their core functionality, tone mapping, performs. So I got their HDR trialware, along with versions from Dynamic Photo HDR and EasyHDR, and ran them head-to-head.

I heard a lot about Photomatix and they seem to do a fair bit of advertising (probably spent some money to tune their website for the top spot in Google search). Well I have finally decided to compare some HDR software to see how they stack up.